gharris@convergencecable.com

Structured Cabling Systems - Page 2

Creative Compromise -
Interior Layout of the Telecommunications Room
by Chuck Siebuhr

These questions are not as silly as they sound. Thinking back, most of us can relate stories of mistakes or assumptions that were made that seem ridiculous now but actually happened. One recent example is that of a 19- inch by 84-inch equipment rack, fully loaded and in service, mounted on top of the in-floor cable trough access plates. The rack can't be moved, therefore, there is no access to the in-floor system inside the TR. This problem will require significant time and expense to rectify, yet it must be done, or a very bad situation will be perpetuated, leading to more complications in the future.

"Had accurate and detailed drawings been prepared, neither situation would have occurred."

Another instance of poor planning and lack of communication created a situation that, fortunately, could be corrected without too much trouble or expense. The door was 36 inches by 80 inches, but it opened inward instead of outward. Problem? It opened right into the planned location for a floor-mounted equipment cabinet, which would only allow the door to open approximately 18 to 20 inches. Solution? The door was simply re-hung to open outward, as it should have been done originally.


Had accurate and detailed drawings been prepared, neither situation would have occurred. One extremely important consideration is exactly what to include in the drawing and what may be better defined in a legend either on the plan itself or as an attachment. Smaller plans may present call-outs on the drawing, which are explained in the legend. On larger plans, more details can be included in the drawing itself. In either case, include all information that could affect the completed design. For example, note the exact height of equipment AFF (above finished floor) and that fluorescent light fixtures shall be mounted 8 1/2 feet AFF. Provide exact reference measurements and any additional helpful information wherever possible, such as "Emergency power fail transfer spotlight to be mounted on north wall, Room 521, 8 feet AFF, adjacent to utility shaft as indicated on plan drawing."


Special notes or specific detailed drawings may be required to clarify pathways, routing or equipment layouts. Outlines of other support fixtures or furniture should be represented as well, in order to coordinate actual space requirements and safe workspace. Examples would be desks, chairs, bookshelves or storage cabinets and the necessary free space to open cabinet doors, etc. It may sound unbelievable, but we have seen plans that allowed for a 30-inch by 60-inch desk but did not consider space for the chair that went with it. Copies of all documents should be maintained in a master file and used to prepare final as-builts to be provided to the client upon completion and acceptance.

Other details to consider might include specifications for particular components or hardware. For example: "Ladder rack, width 6 inches, supported at 8 feet AFF along east wall of Room 521, 4 inches above plywood backboard." This notation should correspond with dimensions provided for the placement and mounting of backboards elsewhere on the plans. An 8- foot by 4-foot panel mounted horizontally, with the upper edge 4 inches below the ladder rack would place the lower edge 44 inches AFF. Details like this become increasingly important as all of the pieces come together and can be painfully obvious oversights during the construction phase, if not carefully attended to in the initial planning stages.


Room 522 is laid out to accommodate the full potential of the area being served, including nominal growth for the number of WAOs and necessary equipment. This room actually serves as both an ER (equipment room) and a TR and, as such, qualifies for the more stringent environmental conditions of an ER. (Refer to TIA 569A.) Details such as the size and type of sweeps and waterfalls are included, as well as placement of the equipment cabinets, depth and direction of door openings and notes on where dedicated power, as well as convenience AC outlets, will be placed. As in Room 521, the location of fire extinguishers, emergency lighting and shelves/storage units are also indicated on the plan, as is the penetration between the two rooms and the type of firestopping to be used.

Note that the level of detail should even include the colors associated with termination and equipment fields, depending on the function(s) being served. Much more often than not, we hear complaints about requiring details to this degree, but the fact is that it makes all the difference between a successful, professionally executed project and one that is the old "ready, fire, aim" concept that gets band-aided as it progresses. Planning and detail-orientation are inarguably the keys to any successful implementation effort and complex projects require more detail.

As the industry's technological capabilities continue to advance at dizzying speeds, our almost total dependence on infrastructure reliability is one of the most critical issues addressed on a daily, if not hourly, basis. Every link in this chain is vital to continued flexibility, adaptability and interconnectivity.


"Examples presented here, among many others surfacing across the industry, are only the tip of the iceberg. Many more will surface..."

A carefully planned telecommunications space, whether a main cross-connect (MC), ER or TR, is essentially a control point that can either be smoothly and easily administered and maintained, or it can be one of the most serious liabilities that threatens the effectiveness of the network. Poorly planned spaces account for inestimable amounts of lost time and downtime, as well as troubleshooting costs on a daily basis. And, most of these types of installations will not be able to serve emerging applications, as originally intended, largely due to poor planning and less than premium quality workmanship. Isn't it time that we focus more attention on conceptualizing, planning and designing the spaces to serve as intended, rather than simply specifying and purchasing cable, blocks, jacks and hardware and then throwing them together with the hope that they will pass today's minimum Category 5 testing standards? This approach is no longer acceptable.


For those who may feel such attention is not really necessary, we should relate a recent visit to a huge three-year-old industrial facility. Millions of dollars were spent on cabling and provisioning the site. However, virtually everything observed needed to be reworked to keep it operating at 10BASE-T, not to mention plans to migrate to 100 or 1000BASE-T. MAC activity was a nightmare; troubleshooting was a daily ritual, and the telecommunications spaces were in total disarray. Lack of any type of professional planning was evident everywhere. It would be impossible to calculate the client's losses associated with this type of administration. Although it will be an extremely complex and costly undertaking, the facility's management is considering rehabilitating the entire cable plant facility system to bring it up to the standards that should have been implemented in the first place.


Examples presented here, among many others surfacing across the industry, are only the tip of the iceberg. Many more will surface as data speeds jump from 10 to 100 and 1000 Mbps. With each migratory step, more complex problems will be evident, as will the associated costs to provide viable solutions. Poor planning efforts suddenly will be in the spotlight, and penalties will be severe in some cases. Now is the time to proceed carefully, take the time to do the extra research, analyze the plan, and then analyze it again. Leave out no detail and ensure that everyone involved with the project has a clear understanding of expectations, methods and procedures. Document everything.

Evolution can be briefly described as the process of natural selection. As the industry evolves, natural selection would seem to favor something that provides whole solutions, rather than proposals that address just a portion of the problem. In this context, that something would be defined as the infrastructure in its entirety, from the first conceptual sketch to the last TSB95-compliant test report printed and everything in between. No detail is unimportant!

 

[top of page]      [previous page]
 
Chuck Siebuhr, RCDD, is senior technical editor for Cabling Business Magazine and an instructor at Cabling Business Institute. He has more than 30 years experience in the telecommunications industry. Siebuhr is a founding member of Association of Cabling Professionals (ACP), is a member of BICSI, and is listed in National's Who's Who of Honored Professionals and Executives, 1999-2000 edition.