|
Structured
Cabling Systems - Page 2
Creative
Compromise -
Interior Layout of the Telecommunications Room by
Chuck Siebuhr
|
| These
questions are not as silly as they sound. Thinking back,
most of us can relate stories of mistakes or assumptions
that were made that seem ridiculous now but actually happened.
One recent example is that of a 19- inch by 84-inch equipment
rack, fully loaded and in service, mounted on top of the
in-floor cable trough access plates. The rack can't be
moved, therefore, there is no access to the in-floor system
inside the TR. This problem will require significant time
and expense to rectify, yet it must be done, or a very
bad situation will be perpetuated, leading to more complications
in the future. |
"Had
accurate and detailed drawings been prepared, neither
situation would have occurred."
|
|
|
|
Another
instance of poor planning and lack of communication created
a situation that, fortunately, could be corrected without
too much trouble or expense. The door was 36 inches by 80
inches, but it opened inward instead of outward. Problem?
It opened right into the planned location for a floor-mounted
equipment cabinet, which would only allow the door to open
approximately 18 to 20 inches. Solution? The door was simply
re-hung to open outward, as it should have been done originally.
|
|
Had accurate and detailed drawings been prepared, neither
situation would have occurred. One extremely important consideration
is exactly what to include in the drawing and what may be
better defined in a legend either on the plan itself or as
an attachment. Smaller plans may present call-outs on the
drawing, which are explained in the legend. On larger plans,
more details can be included in the drawing itself. In either
case, include all information that could affect the completed
design. For example, note the exact height of equipment AFF
(above finished floor) and that fluorescent light fixtures
shall be mounted 8 1/2 feet AFF. Provide exact reference measurements
and any additional helpful information wherever possible,
such as "Emergency power fail transfer spotlight to be mounted
on north wall, Room 521, 8 feet AFF, adjacent to utility shaft
as indicated on plan drawing."
|
|
Special notes or specific detailed drawings may be required
to clarify pathways, routing or equipment layouts. Outlines
of other support fixtures or furniture should be represented
as well, in order to coordinate actual space requirements
and safe workspace. Examples would be desks, chairs, bookshelves
or storage cabinets and the necessary free space to open cabinet
doors, etc. It may sound unbelievable, but we have seen plans
that allowed for a 30-inch by 60-inch desk but did not consider
space for the chair that went with it. Copies of all documents
should be maintained in a master file and used to prepare
final as-builts to be provided to the client upon completion
and acceptance.
Other
details to consider might include specifications for particular
components or hardware. For example: "Ladder rack, width 6
inches, supported at 8 feet AFF along east wall of Room 521,
4 inches above plywood backboard." This notation should correspond
with dimensions provided for the placement and mounting of
backboards elsewhere on the plans. An 8- foot by 4-foot panel
mounted horizontally, with the upper edge 4 inches below the
ladder rack would place the lower edge 44 inches AFF. Details
like this become increasingly important as all of the pieces
come together and can be painfully obvious oversights during
the construction phase, if not carefully attended to in the
initial planning stages.
|
|
Room 522 is laid out to accommodate the full potential of
the area being served, including nominal growth for the number
of WAOs and necessary equipment. This room actually serves
as both an ER (equipment room) and a TR and, as such, qualifies
for the more stringent environmental conditions of an ER.
(Refer to TIA 569A.) Details such as the size and type of
sweeps and waterfalls are included, as well as placement of
the equipment cabinets, depth and direction of door openings
and notes on where dedicated power, as well as convenience
AC outlets, will be placed. As in Room 521, the location of
fire extinguishers, emergency lighting and shelves/storage
units are also indicated on the plan, as is the penetration
between the two rooms and the type of firestopping to be used.
Note
that the level of detail should even include the colors associated
with termination and equipment fields, depending on the function(s)
being served. Much more often than not, we hear complaints
about requiring details to this degree, but the fact is that
it makes all the difference between a successful, professionally
executed project and one that is the old "ready, fire, aim"
concept that gets band-aided as it progresses. Planning and
detail-orientation are inarguably the keys to any successful
implementation effort and complex projects require more detail.
As the
industry's technological capabilities continue to advance
at dizzying speeds, our almost total dependence on infrastructure
reliability is one of the most critical issues addressed on
a daily, if not hourly, basis. Every link in this chain is
vital to continued flexibility, adaptability and interconnectivity.
|
"Examples
presented here, among many others surfacing
across the industry, are only the tip of the
iceberg. Many
more will surface..."
|
|
A carefully planned telecommunications space,
whether a main cross-connect (MC), ER or TR, is
essentially a control point that can either be
smoothly and easily administered and maintained,
or it can be one of the most serious liabilities
that threatens the effectiveness of the network.
Poorly planned spaces account for inestimable
amounts of lost time and downtime, as well as
troubleshooting costs on a daily basis. And, most
of these types of installations will not be able
to serve emerging applications, as originally
intended, largely due to poor planning and less
than premium quality workmanship. Isn't it time
that we focus more attention on conceptualizing,
planning and designing the spaces to serve as
intended, rather than simply specifying and purchasing
cable, blocks, jacks and hardware and then throwing
them together with the hope that they will pass
today's minimum Category 5 testing standards?
This approach is no longer acceptable.
|
|
|
For those who may feel such attention is not really
necessary, we should relate a recent visit to a huge
three-year-old industrial facility. Millions of dollars
were spent on cabling and provisioning the site. However,
virtually everything observed needed to be reworked
to keep it operating at 10BASE-T, not to mention plans
to migrate to 100 or 1000BASE-T. MAC activity was a
nightmare; troubleshooting was a daily ritual, and the
telecommunications spaces were in total disarray. Lack
of any type of professional planning was evident everywhere.
It would be impossible to calculate the client's losses
associated with this type of administration. Although
it will be an extremely complex and costly undertaking,
the facility's management is considering rehabilitating
the entire cable plant facility system to bring it up
to the standards that should have been implemented in
the first place.
|
|
|
Examples presented here, among many others surfacing across
the industry, are only the tip of the iceberg. Many more will
surface as data speeds jump from 10 to 100 and 1000 Mbps.
With each migratory step, more complex problems will be evident,
as will the associated costs to provide viable solutions.
Poor planning efforts suddenly will be in the spotlight, and
penalties will be severe in some cases. Now is the time to
proceed carefully, take the time to do the extra research,
analyze the plan, and then analyze it again. Leave out no
detail and ensure that everyone involved with the project
has a clear understanding of expectations, methods and procedures.
Document everything.
Evolution
can be briefly described as the process of natural selection.
As the industry evolves, natural selection would seem to favor
something that provides whole solutions, rather than proposals
that address just a portion of the problem. In this context,
that something would be defined as the infrastructure in its
entirety, from the first conceptual sketch to the last TSB95-compliant
test report printed and everything in between. No detail is
unimportant!
|
| [top
of page] [previous
page] |
| |
Chuck
Siebuhr, RCDD, is senior technical editor for Cabling
Business Magazine and an instructor at Cabling Business
Institute. He has more than 30 years experience in the
telecommunications industry. Siebuhr is a founding member
of Association of Cabling Professionals (ACP), is a member
of BICSI, and is listed in National's Who's Who of Honored
Professionals and Executives, 1999-2000 edition.
|
|
|
 |